[1]黄长煌,林慈銮.福建鹭峰山晶洞花岗岩锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J].华东地质,2019,40(03):170-178.[doi:10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2019.03.002]
　HUANG Chang-huang,LIN Ci-luan.Zircon U-Pb age of the Lufengshan miarolitic granite inFujian Province and its geological significance[J].East China Geology,2019,40(03):170-178.[doi:10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2019.03.002]
点击复制

福建鹭峰山晶洞花岗岩锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义()
分享到：

《华东地质》[ISSN:2096-1871/CN:32-1865/P]

卷:
40
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
170-178
栏目:
基础地质
出版日期:
2019-09-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Zircon U-Pb age of the Lufengshan miarolitic granite inFujian Province and its geological significance
文章编号:
2096-1871(2019)03-170-09
作者:
黄长煌; 林慈銮
(福建省地质调查研究院,福州 350013)
Author(s):
HUANG Chang-huang;  LIN Ci-luan
(Fujian Institute of Geological Survey, Fuzhou 350013,China)
关键词:
福建鹭峰山;  晶洞花岗岩;  A型花岗岩;  台湾东部;  晚白垩世
Keywords:
Lufengshan;  Fujian Province;  miarolitic granite;  A-type granite;  eastern Taiwan;  Late Cretaceous
分类号:
P588.12; P632+7
DOI:
10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2019.03.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过研究福建鹭峰山晶洞花岗岩的岩相学及锆石U-Pb同位素年代学特征,并与台湾东部地区同时代的岩浆岩进行简要对比,探讨闽台地区晚中生代岩浆活动特征及构造环境。鹭峰山岩体主要为中细粒晶洞碱长花岗岩,且具有特征性的晶洞构造,属A型花岗岩。鹭峰山晶洞花岗岩三个代表性岩石样品LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄分别为84.5±1.0 Ma、81.8±0.6 Ma和84.9±0.5 Ma,结合其他晶洞花岗岩体的年龄资料,认为长乐—南澳断裂带南东侧晶洞花岗岩的形成时代为93.8～81.8 Ma,属晚白垩世。岩浆作用具向东迁移现象,可能受古太平洋板块的俯冲后撤作用控制。该次构造岩浆活动与台湾东部酸性岩浆作用属同一构造岩浆事件。
Abstract:
In comparison with the contemporary granite in eastern Taiwan, this paper analyzed the characteristics of tectonic and magmatic activities and tectonic environment of Fujian and Taiwan during late Mesozoic using petrography and zircon U-Pb isotope ages of Lufengshan miarolitic granite. Main rock type at Lufengshan is medium to fine-grained miarolitic alkali feldspar granite, which belongs to A-type granite with the characteristic miarolitic texture. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating yielded three ages of 84.5±1.0 Ma, 81.8±0.6 Ma and 84.9±0.5 Ma for the Lufengshan miarolitic granite. Combined with the ages of other miarolitic granites in the area, it can be concluded that the miarolitic granites in the southeastern part of the Changle-Nan’ao fault zone formed at 93.8～81.8 Ma, belonging to late Cretaceous. The magmatic activity moved eastward, which might have been controlled by subduction retrogression of the paleo-Pacific Plate. Therefore, this tectonic-magmatic activity and felsic magmatism in eastern Taiwan should belong to the same tectonic-magmatic event.

参考文献/References:

[1] 福建省地质调查研究院.中国区域地质志·福建志[M].北京:地质出版社,2016:522-527.

[2] 吴克隆, 严炳铨, 陆振球, 等. 福建省晶洞(钾长)花岗岩一般特征及成因初步探讨[J].福建地质,1982,1(2):1-28.
[3] 彭亚鸣, 袁朴.福建魁岐碱性花岗岩特征及其成因类型[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),1984,20(4):740-752.
[4] 洪大卫,郭文岐, 李戈晶, 等. 福建沿海晶洞花岗岩带的岩石学和成因演化[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,1987:1-35.
[5] MARTIN H, BONIN B, DIDIER J,et al.中国东南部福州花岗质杂岩的岩石学和地球化学[J].地球化学,1991,20(2):101-111.
[6] 郑声俭, 黄泉祯, 严炳铨.福建省侵入岩岩石谱系单位划分[M].厦门:厦门大学出版社,2000.
[7] 邱检生, 肖娥, 胡建, 等. 福建北东沿海高分异Ⅰ型花岗岩的成因:锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学和Nd-Hf同位素制约[J].岩石学报,2008,24(11):2468-2484.
[8] 单强, 曾乔松, 李建康, 等. 福建魁岐晶洞花岗岩锆石U-Pb年代学及其地球化学研究[J].岩石学报,2014,30(4):1155-1167.
[9] 李良林, 周汉文, 陈植华, 等. 福建太姥山地区和鼓山地区A型花岗岩对比及其地球动力学意义[J].现代地质,2013,27(3):509-524.
[10] 夏炎, 刘磊, 徐夕生.中国东南部晚中生代A型花岗岩类与古太平洋板块俯冲-后撤[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2016,35(6):1109-1119.
[11] 姜耀辉, 王国昌.中国东南部晚中生代花岗岩成因与深部动力学机制——古太平洋板块反复俯冲-后退模式[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2016,35(6):1073-1081.
[12] CHEN C H, LIN W, LAN C Y, et al. Geochemical, Sr and Nd isotopic characteristics and tectonic implications for three stages of igneous rock in the Late Yanshanian(Cretaceous)orogeny, SE China[J].Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences,2004,95(1/2):237-248.?
[13] 何春荪.台湾地质概论:台湾地质图说明书 [M].2版.台北: 经济部中央地质调查所,1986:1-163.
[14] HUANG C Y, YUAN P B, TSAO S J. Temporal and spatial records of active arc-continent collision in Taiwan: a synthesis[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin,2006,118(3):274-288.
[15] CHEN C H, LIN W, LU H Y, et al. Cretaceous fractionated I-type granitoids and metaluminous A-type granites in SE China: the Late Yanshanian postorogenic magmatism[J].Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Science,2000,91:195-205.
[16] CHEN C H, HSICH P S, WANG K L, et al. Zircon LA-ICPMS U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes of Huayu(Penghu Islands)volcanics in the Taiwan Strait and tectonic implication[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2010,37(1):17-30.
[17] CHEN W S, HUANG Y C, LIU C H, et al. U-Pb zircon geochronology constraints on the ages of the Tananao Schist Belt and timing of orogenic events in Taiwan: Implications for a new tectonic evolution of the South China Block during the Mesozoic[J].Tectonophysics,2016,686:68-81.
[18] 刘凯, 厉子龙, 徐维光, 等. 华南中生代岩浆岩时空分布和迁移与古太平洋板块俯冲过程[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2016,35(6):1141-1155.
[19] 侯可军, 李延河, 田有荣.LA-MC-ICP-MS锆石微区原位U-Pb定年技术[J].矿床地质,2009,28(4):481-492.
[20] LIU Y S, GAO S, HU Z C, et al. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen: U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons from mantle xenoliths[J].Journal of Petrology,2010,51(1/2):537-571.
[21] 吴柏兴. 福建莆田渡边火山岩锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J].福建地质,2016,35(3):163-171.
[22] LI X H. Cretaceous magmatism and lithospheric extension in Southeast China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2000,18(3):293-305.
[23] 李良林, 周汉文, 陈植华, 等. 福建沿海晚中生代花岗质岩石成因及其地质意义[J].地质通报,2013,32(7):1047-1062.
[24] LI Z, QIU J S, YANG X M. A review of the geochronology and geochemistry of Late Yanshanian(Cretaceous)plutons along the Fujian coastal area of southeastern China: Implications for magma evolution related to slab break-off and rollback in the Creta-ceous[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2014,128:232-248.
[25] ZHAO J L, QIU J S, LIU L, et al. Geochronological, geochemical and Nd-Hf isotopic constraints on the petrogenesis of Late Cretaceous A-type granites from the southeastern coast of Fujian Province, South China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2015,105:338-359.
[26] 黄长煌.福建东山变质岩LA-ICP-MS同位素年龄及其地质意义[J].中国地质, 2016,43(3):738-750.
[27] 黄长煌.福建东山中生代花岗岩的LA-ICP-MS锆石同位素定年及其地质意义[J].福建地质,2015,34(4):261-271.
[28] 黄长煌. 台湾东部未变形花岗岩LA-ICP-MS锆石 U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J].地质通报2017,36(10):1740-1749.
[29] 黄长煌. 台湾东澳片岩同位素年龄及地质意义[J].中国地质,2017,44(6):466-479.
[30] LAN C Y, JAHN B M, MERTZMAN S A, et al. Subduction-related granitic Rocks of Taiwan[J].Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences,1996, 14(1/2):11-28.
[31] CHEN W S, HUANG Y C, LIU C H, et al. U-Pb zircon geochronology constraints on the ages of the Tananao Schist Belt and timing of orogenic events in Taiwan: Implications for a new tectonic evolution of the South China Block during the Mesozoic[J].Tectonophysics,2016,686:68-81.
[32] WINTSCH R P, YANG H J, LI X H, et al. Geochronologic evidence for a cold arc-continent collision: The Taiwan orogeny[J].Lithos,2011,125(1/2):236-248.
[33] HALL R.Cenozoic geological and plate tectonic evolution of SE Asia and the SW Pacific computer-based reconstructions, model and animations[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2002,20(4):353-431.
[34] YU H S, SONG G S. Submarine Physiography around Taiwan and its relation to tectonic seting[J].Journal of the Geological Society of China,1993,36(2):139-156.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*收稿日期:2018-04-10 修订日期:2018-09-28 责任编辑:谭桂丽
基金项目:中国地质调查局“闽台中生代构造-岩浆岩区域地质专项调查(编号:12120114043301)”和“福建海域1:5 万平海、浮叶幅海洋区域地质调查(编号:GZH2014002011)”项目联合资助。
第一作者简介:黄长煌,1962年生,男,高级工程师,主要从事区域地质和矿产地质调查工作。 摘要:
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-19